Read more on the Economists article titled “Manufacturing: The End of Cheap China”
The matter of International Labor Laws has been largely debated and criticized lately, due to the importance and also due to the significance of these laws in relation to the tremendously large degree of globalization that has become a part of normality during the last decades.
These laws and standards can be best described as the main conventions that have been agreed upon by all interested international parties or actors and which have been developed and modified in order to cater to the needs of basic workers. They relate to these workers’ rights and they are set to boost the job security and the employment terms at a global scale. These labor laws are therefore meant to ensure the proper and also the minimum degree of labor protection for global workers and they are meant to abolish all inhumane labor practices.
But while everything sounds logical and also positive, one question continues to linger: should these international labor laws be enforced in any way? Think of this question as asking yourself whether some high-quality San Marcos flooring plans should be implemented in all homes on the planet, simply because they are said and also meant to improve the convenience and design of all homes. Or think of asking yourself a similar question concerning a Brazilian keratin treatment – it might work for a lot of folks, but should the entire planet start using it?
Despite of the fact that these laws can often times be regarded as some protective wetsuits or level term life insurance policies, as they are prone to bring their positive contribution into the lives of millions of international workers, they do not imply the use of some enforcement mechanisms. Still, should they be doing so? The truth is that a lot of international cases have already used a lot of formal agreements coming from international institutions such as the ILO – the International Labor Organization.
You do not have to own some masters in accounting in order to understand the fact that there are also plenty of arguments that come to speak in terms of restrictions imposed by these international laws and their potential future enforcement at a global scale. Just like some international umbrella companies or ACN INC might be able to somehow undermine global competitiveness by imposing their very own terms and even contribute to the erode of some domestic or national marketing policies of the rest of companies selling umbrellas, the same could be happening if these international labor laws were to be enforced. A HCG diet plan could help a lot of folks lose some serious weight, gain their peace of mind and help them fight against the adverse effects of weight gain but, just like these global laws and labor standards, they could also be creating all sorts of restrictions, provided they are to be imposed or enforced upon all workers in all corners of the world.
Hence, while these laws could be acting like the Melaleuca Foundation, reinstalling hope in people’s lives, they could be also adding a lot of restrictions in relation to global competitiveness, for instance, or the distortion of market forces.